Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ekored.com

ilpalgong · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
96match
boramcnh.com
ilpalgong
1 co-citations6 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
30match
cg-factory.com
에스디자인
0 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
29match
jinminfood.com
CRESIGN :: CREATIVE DESIGN
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
27match
aehwa.com
Aehwa(애화) | Software
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
26match
jemmething.com
김도현 - 프로덕트 디자이너
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
25match
cerofar.com
세로파 | CEROFAR
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
25match
ggoomdesign.com
꿈디자인
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
23match
jellybearstudio.com
Jellybear Studio - jellybearstudio
0 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
23match
healinnols.com
가봄 | 브랜드네임·CI·BI·패키지·카탈로�·�·
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
23match
hexain.com
HEXAIN
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
23match
4dgeo.com
archijoe
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
23match
genofocus.com
가봄 | 브랜드네임·CI·BI·패키지·카탈로�·�·
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
23match
kjisoo.com
SOO Design
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
23match
hanapattern.com
하나패턴
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
22match
creactived.com
Main - creactivedesign
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
21match
devonpaper.com
데본페이퍼 – DEVON PAPER
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
21match
handong7.com
한동
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
21match
hdgkorea.com
헤파디자인그룹
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.