Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ejosephodom.com

Joseph Odom • Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
3raul.com
Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
louguzman.dev
Luis | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
asimali.net
Asim Ali - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
mugikhan.com
Mugi Khan: Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
pahasara.dev
Pahasara - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
theabgarg.com
Abhishek | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
bytethecarrot.dev
Portfolio - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
aboutjay.com
Jay Patel - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
bruceldev.com
Bruce Lee - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
brunopaz.dev
Bruno Paz - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
hoanle.app
Hoan Le – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
juriw.com
Juri Welz - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
reicolee.com
Reico Lee | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
alexdunne.net
Alex Dunne | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ahsankhan.io
Ahsan Khan - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
abitashiney.com
Abita Shiney Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
juridedej.com
Juri Dedej | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.