Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ejheaton.com

Home - Emma-Jane Heaton, Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
burtgolden.com
Home - Burt Golden, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
authoramyyoung.com
Home - Amy Young, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
alexhmpreston.com
Alex Preston, author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
byblakehill.com
Home - Blake Hill Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
cakincaid.com
Home - Author CA Kincaid
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
fsdeaver.com
Home - F. Scott Deaver, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
jrpestel.com
Home - JR Pestel - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
junoharvey.com
Home - Juno Harvey Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
pageponder.com
Home - Bestselling Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
juditherwin.com
Home - Judith Erwin Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
juditherwinauthor.com
Home - Judith Erwin Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
julietsparkauthor.com
Home - Juliet Spark Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
alfredfdockery.com
Home - Alfred Dockery Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
acharrison.com
A.C. Harrison, Author - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
jrsanders.com
Home - J.R. Sanders - Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
juliashraybman.com
Home - Author Julia Shraybman
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
judasgirl.com
Home - Michelle Stewart Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
loriannauthor.com
Lori Ann, Author
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.