Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ejcoates.com

E. J. Coates – POET AND AUTHOR · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
terraduncan.com
Terra Duncan – Author and Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
69match
effiegraves.com
Effie Graves – YA Contemporary Author and Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
alexlangston.com
A. M. Langston – Author and Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
pamvercoe.com
Pam Vercoe – Artist Poet Author
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
loriwilsonpoet.com
Lori Wilson – Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
mrowannowak.com
M. Rowan Nowak | Poet & Author
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
julianstannardauthor.com
Julian Stannard – Author, Poet, Academic
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
mtraviesowilliams.com
mtw – Poet & Educator
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
jrrogue.com
J. R. ROGUE – Award-nominated poet and novelist.
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
brunildawrites.com
Brunilda Writes – Food and Poems
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
abhishek-mishra.com
Home | Abhishek Mishra – Poet, Author & Literary Critic
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
abigailardellezammit.net
Abigail Ardelle Zammit – Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
paigeriehl.com
Paige Riehl – Poet / Writer
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
alanjwrightauthorpoet.com
Alan j Wright Author Poet
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
abidenningwriting.com
Abigail Denning – Aspiring Author and Poet. Come check out my work.
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
abusiddik.com
Author, Storyteller & Poet – Abu Siddik
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
julesjacob.com
Home - Jules Jacob - Poet . Author
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
buildwriting.com
Buildwriting – Poetry and Short Prose
2 shared topicspoetry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.