Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to eileenrackus.com

Eileen M Rackus - Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
juliaozanne.com
Julia Ozanne - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
lukeliwrites.com
Luke Li - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
jswik.com
J.S. Wik - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
sisdeans.com
Sis Deans | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
regquist.com
Reg Quist - Author |
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
slnorrid.com
S.L. Norrid - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
lulu-smith.com
Lulu Smith - Author -
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
alanchamplin.com
Alan Champlin - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
judithfisherbooks.com
Judith Fisher - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
julieweary.com
Meet The Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
eileentroemel.com
Eileen Troemel – Author and Crocheter
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
lorainelindsay.com
Home - Loraine Lindsay - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
frumpenellaspoon.com
tales of neurodivergent heroes - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
theafricanauthors.com
African Authors
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
lornasotelobooks.com
Home - Author Lorna Sotelo
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
lorenedizel.com
Loren Edizel, Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
pablothepenguin.com
Mary Wisham Fenstermacher - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
tessmarset.com
Home | Tess Marset - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.