Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ehrnhoefer.com

Martin Ehrnhöfer, Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
andrewnbishop.com
Andrew Bishop – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
76match
justintom.com
Justin Tom | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abhinavcodes.tech
Abhinav Anand | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
junlongk.com
Jun Long - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
andrewxu.tech
Andrew Xu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
julian-martin.com
Julian Martin | Software Developer | Vorarlberg | Austria
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
hoera.dev
Samuel Höra - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
ashokj.app
Ashok J — Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
abhyuday.dev
Abhyuday | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
brunogeronimo.com
Bruno Geronimo - JavaScript Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
alex256.com
Alex Kaluzhny | Full Stack Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
butler1970.com
Robert Butler – Senior Software Engineer / Senior PHP Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ehsanghafourian.com
Ehsan Ghafourian | Software Developer & CS Ph.D.
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
8qbit.me
8qBIT | qLabs Software Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
eftomi.com
Tamas Fulop Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
justincomino.com
Justin Comino - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
byrd.digital
Kylan Byrd - Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
abey.dev
Abey Thomas - Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.