Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to egecanozer.dev

Egecan Özer | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
kaartikgupta.com
Kaartik Gupta | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
muteb.dev
Muteb Dev | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
alanxgarcia.dev
Alan Garcia | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
aaandrangom.dev
Anthony Andrango | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
reicolee.com
Reico Lee | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
buraktomruk.dev
Burak Tomruk | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
buraktomruk.com
Burak Tomruk | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
louguzman.dev
Luis | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
eddieb.dev
Eddie Benedetti | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
juanakira.com
Juan Ákira | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alfredojahn.dev
Alfredo Jahn | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
cristianeni.com
Cristian Eni - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
muttahhid.com
Muttahhid Jomeer | Software Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
mudithperera.com
Mudith Perera | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
aksharpatel.dev
Patel Akshar Parshubhai | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
craighaber.dev
Craig Haber | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
abdulrahem-alzoubi.cloud
Abdulrahem Alzoubi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
0xomer.com
Omer | Software Engineer & Instructor
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.