Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to efskap.com

Dmitry Narkevich · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
efimov-ml.com
Dmitry Efimov Machine Learning
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
abdallahnassim.dev
Abdellah Nassim MERIDJA - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
absolutemarket.org
AbsoluteMarket
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
brunchybit.com
brunchybit
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
calebbradshaw.dev
Caleb Bradshaw | Home
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
tevonsb.com
Tevon Strand-Brown
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
adrianlaynez.dev
Adrián Laynez | Research & Engineering
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
lucasrabay.dev
Lucas Rabay Butcher — AI Engineer & Builder
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
sidkodr.com
sidkodr — Siddarth Srinivas | AI/ML Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
100lewis.com
Home | Tyler Lewis
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
jsteinb.com
Jordan Steinberg
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
simonavila.com
Simon Avila
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
alecstashevsky.com
Alec Stashevsky
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
6missedcalls.com
6missedcalls
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
econtechie.com
Damilola Payne — Writing about technology, economics, and society
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
sinisakolaric.com
Home - Siniša Kolarić, Ph.D.
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
lucadl.com
Luca De Leo
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
lucadeleo.com
Luca De Leo
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.