Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to effectivefuck.com

e/fuck · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
fuckapigeon.com
Fuck A Pigeon
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
64match
fuckedurmom.com
FuckedurMom
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
64match
fuckfriday.com
fuck friday
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
63match
fuckiamhigh.com
fuck, i am high.
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
63match
fuckjohnoliver.com
Fuck John Oliver
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
63match
fuckyeahgeekgirls.com
fuckyeahgeekgirls
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
62match
fuckitusa.com
The United States of Fuckit
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
62match
fuckyoureold.com
Fuck, you're old Karl!
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
61match
angrywolfunleashed.com
Shut the Fuck Up! – Can You Handle the Truth?
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
61match
fuckingaustria.com
Fucking Austria ! v r t' ___ONLY___ legal & ethic way 4 u to b xxx naughty!!
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
61match
fuckyoupolitely.com
Fuck You, Politely – A site for people who politely hate people.
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
60match
count-vigo.com
Count Vigo - Chatter from the Vorlds
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
60match
abimagineif.com
ab.i.normal
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
60match
bruh.my
Bruh My
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
60match
bub.org
Home
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
60match
bubbler.me
Bubbler: make fun of our friends photos
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
60match
buckcountybullcrapper.com
Buck County Bull Crapper | Your Finest Fake News Source
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire
60match
bucklesberry.com
The Bucklesberry Gazette – Home of Jon Dawson's humor columns, album reviews and podcasts
1 shared topicshumor-and-satire

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.