Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to eddiefuller.com

Eddie Fuller | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
craighaber.dev
Craig Haber | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
simonesiega.com
Simone Siega | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
abubakar-noorulhassan.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
pahasara.dev
Pahasara - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
eddieb.dev
Eddie Benedetti | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
gabrieldelapena.com
Gabriel | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
juridedej.com
Juri Dedej | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
alexdunne.net
Alex Dunne | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
theabgarg.com
Abhishek | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
louguzman.dev
Luis | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
luanpanno.dev
Luan Panno | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aaronadler.net
Aaron Adler | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
3raul.com
Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
0xomer.com
Omer | Software Engineer & Instructor
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
egecanozer.dev
Egecan Özer | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
juanakira.com
Juan Ákira | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
alanxgarcia.dev
Alan Garcia | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
mugikhan.com
Mugi Khan: Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.