Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to edcobos.com

Edgar Cobos · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
aalazz.me
Alexis Lazzarotto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
abuzer.tech
Abuzer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
abigeorge.com
Abi Geroge
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
acatl.dev
Acatl Pacheco — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
jughosta.com
Julia Rechkunova (@jughosta)
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
julianofirme.com
Juliano Firme
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
lstoiber.com
Lukas Stoiber
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
owenhayes.dev
Owen Hayes
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
reggiemenson.com
Reggie Tachie-Menson
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
bryanlown.com
Bryan Lown - Software Engineer | Bryan Lown
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
bukaha.com
Bukaha OÜ | Software engineering
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
julesfiliot.com
Jules FILIOT
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
angad.tech
Angad Misra - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
fucos.io
fucos :: FUture COmmunciation Systems
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
juanmaruizf.com
Juan Manuel Ruiz
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
albaraamansour.dev
Al-Baraa Mansour
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
butenko.me
Nikita Butenko
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
alexborisov.org
Alex Borisov
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.