Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to edafatech.com

Edafa Tech · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
astrotechsol.com
Astro Tech
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
snctech.co.uk 🇬🇧
SNC Tech
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
aswasthi.com
Aswasti Technology
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
andromeda-technologies.com
Andromeda Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
3a-technology.com
3A Technology
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
honeysha.com
HoneySha Tech
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
jtech.dev
J Tech
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
redrivertechnologies.com
Red River Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
costatechsolutions.com
Costa Tech Solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
aciestech.com
Acies Tech
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
atulatech.com
Atula Technologies Ltd.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
cocoatechnologies.mx 🇲🇽
Cocoa Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
cocoatechnologies.com.mx 🇲🇽
Cocoa Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
lotustechlabs.com
Lotus Tech Labs
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
cascadetechnology.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cascade Technology
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
athenadevtech.com
Athena Dev Tech
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
edafa-software.com
Edafa Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
p2msolutions.com
P2M Solutions - Innovating Software, Empowering Businesses
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.