similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ebxml.net

Ebxml alternatives & similar sites

OASIS Open | Setting The Standard For Open Collaboration — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
omlox.io ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	The Open Locating Standard: omlox	en	technology-and-computing TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omlox.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	The Open Locating Standard: omlox	en	technology-and-computing TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daniel-codex.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	goholi.life — Codex Collaboration Timeline	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datacollaborations.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - Peer learning network for data collaborations	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3gppscout.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	3GPP Scout - The Standards Co-Pilot	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omnidssi.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	OmniServer OPC DA & UA Server for Connecting Non-Standard Devices	en	technology-and-computing HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
procept.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Procept Visual - Collaborative Concept Innovation	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
proceptvisual.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Procept Visual - Collaborative Concept Innovation	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscs.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	College Station Computer Science	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datacollaborative.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	QuickBase Expert Builder \| QuickBase Partner \| Data Collaborative	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
revisr.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Revisr - Collaborative Document Review Platform	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buceros.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Buceros.dev \| Cultivating the digital forest	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eclipse.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Eclipse Foundation \| Powering Open Innovation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anuragmjain.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Information Overload – Cutting through the latest trends in products, platforms and technology in the age of information.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datastandard.io ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Data Standard – The premier community for Data Scientists	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prodyna.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Navigating the Digital Future Together \| PRODYNA	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3dfile.io ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Navigating Tomorrow’s Innovations and Trends	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4founders.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	4Founders: Honest feedback for open-source projects and the people who ship them	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.