Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ebookcph.com

Charotar Publishing House · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
acadpubl.org
Academic Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
ecopublishinghouse.com
Home - Eco Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
burningbulbmedia.com
Burning Bulb Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
redfame.com
Redfame Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
acrpublishing.com
ACR Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
academicpublishings.com
Academic Publishing -
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
aeonpublishing.net
Aeon Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
acadpubl.com
Home - Academic Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
parkerhousebooks.com
Parker House Publishing - Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
jubaeapublishing.com
Jubaea Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
acp-testing.com
AC Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
acpublishing.com
AC Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
agorapublishingireland.com
Agora Publishing Ireland
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
panopliapublishing.com
Panoplia Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
5th-enigma.com
Arima Publishing-index
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
alacrityhousepublishing.com
Alacrity House Publishing LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
losharu.com
Losharu Publishing LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
paperstery.com
Paperstery | Professional Book Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.