Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ebdac.com

Ebdac Software GmbH · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
q5software.de 🇩🇪
Q5 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
q5-software.de 🇩🇪
Q5 Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
obstbauberatung.de 🇩🇪
Farm Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
anima.software
Anima Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
tevis.com
Tevis Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
noel-software.de 🇩🇪
Noël Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
sinexs.com
Sinexs Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
pecher-software.de 🇩🇪
Pecher Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
acolens.com
NURIZON Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
tgbyte.com
TG Byte Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
nurizon-software.de 🇩🇪
NURIZON Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
nurizon.de 🇩🇪
NURIZON Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
nurizonsoftware.de 🇩🇪
NURIZON Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
sebastian-software.de 🇩🇪
Sebastian Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
sebastiansoftware.de 🇩🇪
Sebastian Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
mub-software.cloud
m+b Software GmbH - Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
mub-software.com
m+b Software GmbH - Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
proartikel.de 🇩🇪
ProArtikel | Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.