similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to easytextcheck.com

Easytextcheck alternatives & similar sites

easytextcheck - document editing and proofing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
enzoconsultancy.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	EnZo Consultancy - Editing and Proofreading Services	en	publishing-industry Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acestt.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Ayana Chester Editing Services (ACES) - Copy Editing and Proofreading, Trinidad and Tobago - Home	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eagleeyeeditors.me ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Eagle Eye Editors \| Professional Editing and Proofreading Services	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hollandmountfordediting.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Holland-Mountford Editing \| Scientific editing – Editorial and proofreading services for biologists and biomedical scientists	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acadiaediting.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Acadia Editing Services \| Academic Editing for Scholars in the Social Sciences and Humanities	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bookeditingservices.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Book Editing Services UK \| Book Editor \| Proofreading Service	United Kingdom en	publishing-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
her-ltd.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Scientific Editing Services - Her Ltd	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helpingkidswrite.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Gail Weber \| editing services for print and the web	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
treetopediting.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Treetop Editing - Editorial Services for Academics and Businesses \| Treetop Editing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fromthehearteditingservices.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home \| From the Heart Editing Services	en	publishing-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roboedit.app ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	RoboEdit — AI OCR & Manuscript Editing for Books, Memoirs, and Archives	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1strateediting.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	1st Rate Editing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iceediting.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ICE Editing - ICE Editing	en	publishing-industry Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
360researchpapers.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Scientific Manuscript Editing Services \| 360 Research Papers	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oxfordediting.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Oxford Editing: Editing services for academic authors	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aclang.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Academic Language Experts \| Academic Translation and Editing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hepatogastroenterology.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Documents Delivered	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hepatologyjournal.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Documents Delivered	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.