Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to earticle.net

Earticle alternatives & similar sites

학술논문 검색서비스 - earticle — 12 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
tryeverpub.com 61 match
1 shared topics
EverPub — HWP·PDF·DOCX를 EPUB3 전자책으로 ko publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
ibestin.com 61 match
1 shared topics
베스틴무역 ko publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
a-publishing.com 60 match
1 shared topics
홈 — à Publishing ko publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
kyungsungmedia.com 60 match
1 shared topics
경성미디어그룹 ko publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
chulpaneasy.com 60 match
1 shared topics
출판easy ko publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
doorofweb.com 60 match
1 shared topics
Home - DoorWeb ko publishing-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
paeksan.com 60 match
1 shared topics
백산학회 ko publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
minumsa.com 31 match
1 shared topics
민음사 출판그룹 ko publishing-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 2
charmsorim.com 31 match
1 shared topics
도서출판 참서림 ko publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
kyungmoon.com 31 match
1 shared topics
경문사 ko publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
student-b.com 30 match
1 shared topics
Student B Press ko publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
bandicom.com 30 match
1 shared topics
반디컴 ko publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.