similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to eager.ch

Eager alternatives & similar sites

EAGER | European Agricultural Gaseous Emissions Inventory Researchers Network — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
data4action.eu ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ENERGee Watch – The European Network of Regional GhG Emissions and Energy Watch	European Union en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ecohostingnet.eu ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Eco Hosting.net – European network of eco-hosts in wild nature	European Union en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
encanetwork.eu ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	European Network of Heads of Nature Conservation Agencies \| ENCA	European Union en	environment TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cleaneuropenetwork.eu ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Clean Europe Network - The European Litter Prevention Association	European Union en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
proud.ph ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Proud.ph - Philippines Ocean Protection & Research Network	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
augustacosta.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AUGUSTA COSTA \| RESEARCHER	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
airqualitynow.eu ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Air Quality Now \| European City Air Quality Comparison	European Union en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eeac-network.eu ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	European Environment and Sustainable Development Advisory Councils Network \| European Environment and Sustainable Development Advisory Councils Network	European Union en	environment Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amber.international ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	AMBER, Adaptive Management of Barriers in European River	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nature-value.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Nature Value Consortium - The European nature-based solution standard	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elf-tr.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	- ELF Trails and Research	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
eseh.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	European Society for Environmental History	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catagen.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	CATAGEN \| Green Emissions Testing & Catalyst Ageing Solutions	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cathelediting.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Ecologist, Researcher, Copy-editor, Writer - Cathel Hutchison	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3for-project.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	3FOR Project – Developing climate-smart forestry strategies for European regions	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlanticresource.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Site Home Page \| AORA - Atlantic Ocean Research Alliance	en	environment Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erc-indonesia.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Yayasan Environmental Research Center	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccnetglobal.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - Conservation Coaches Network	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.