similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to drstephenjames.com

Drstephenjames alternatives & similar sites

Dr. Stephen H. James | Psychological Assessments in Toronto — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Mental Health →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
havenpsychservices.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Haven Psychological Services \| Psychologists London Ontario	en	mental-health Wix	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
crystalgoals.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Psychological Assessments & Mental Health Support \| Crystal Goals	en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dranneimhoff.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Anne Imhoff \| Psychological Assessment, Psychotherapy, Career Assessment and Counseling	en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherinescarf.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Catherine Scarf, Ph.D. — Psychological Assessment \| Los Angeles	US~ en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
activepsychology.au ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Active Psychology - Child Assessments & Counselling	AU en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
desiertopsych.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Desierto Psychological PLLC \| psychology \| Arizona, USA	en	mental-health Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barrie-psychologist.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Psychotherapy & Assessments In Barrie \| Psychology For Life	en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
navigatingminds.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Navigating Minds \| Neuropsychological Assessments & Therapy \| Manchester & Stockport	GB~ en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hawaiisakuracenter.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Sakura Center For Psychological Assessment & Therapy \| Kapolei, HI 96707	US~ en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pearsonclinical.co.uk ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Pearson Clinical Assessment UK	GB en	mental-health Adobe Experience Manager	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pkppa.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Home - Pakistan Psychological Association	en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bayareapsychologyfl.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Home - Bay Area Psychology	US~ en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
drashleyelefantbaratz.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Outside the Lines: Psychological Assessment and Therapy Services	en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
salepsychologicalservices.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Sale Psychological Services	en	mental-health Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bapapsych.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Bay Area Psychological Association (BAPA)	en	mental-health WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2bpsychservices.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	2B Psychological Services \| Northshore Therapists	en	mental-health Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amcpsych.com.au ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Psychologists in South Western Sydney \| AMC Psychology	AU en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
actwithpurpose.com.au ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Nicole Scott Clinical Psychologist	AU en	mental-health WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.