Piperic Business Intelligence

similar sites

Sites similar to dragula.dev

ddragula (Dawid Draguła) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

ddrakard · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dderby (David Derby) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

p0l0 (Marco) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

bjartesola (Bjarte Sola) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Nimut · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

studio-feiler.com

enaaacode (ena) · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

apisq · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

liammullane.com

liam-m · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

anyfld · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

trey-k · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

leofigs · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

LeviWB (Levi) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

meji46 (Meji) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

nilsfast · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

guns (Sung Pae) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jinxapi · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

orelby (Or'el) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

cottondroid.com

olgadg (Olga Dominguez) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.