similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to dphilippus.com

Dphilippus alternatives & similar sites

Daniel Philippus, EI | Hydrology PhD Candidate at Colorado School of Mines: large-domain river temperature modeling, remote sensing, and hydraulic modeling — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
environmentalbiophysics.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Environmental Biophysics - Measuring and Modeling the Environment	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
almsc.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Simulation Alabama \| Modeling and Simulation	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ml4science.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Data-Driven Modeling in Science and Engineering / Spring 2026 - American University of Beirut	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamquinnphd.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Adam Quinn, PhD \| Historian of Computing, Labor, and the Environment	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aidan-matthews.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aidan Matthews \| Home	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rolandyan.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Roland Yan \| Neuroscience Researcher & MSBS Student at Mount Sinai	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aiaa-appliedsurrogate.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	AIAA Applied Surrogate Modeling Workshop \| AASM	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dorukekingen.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Doruk Ekingen - PhD Student in Aerosol Science & Cultural Advocate	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hermes2014.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Hermes 2014 - Materials Modelling Summer School	UK~ en	science Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heroica.tech ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Heroica Technologies – Next-generation photonics for energy, sensing, imaging, and more.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentsofsteam.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Agents of STEAM \| Science, technology, engineering, art, and mathematics in Southern Arizona	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
labpeaks.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Laboratory Controller, Intelligent Temperature Controller, Constant Temperature and Speed Controller - Shanghai Peaks Measure&Control Tech Ltd.	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mineralsofthefuture.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Nathaniel Dolton-Thornton \| Critical Minerals Researcher	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mitplusn.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	MIT+N - Mosul Institute of Technology and Nature Science - MIT+N	United States~ en	science Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cplusc.co.uk ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Cooper and Caulcott Ltd: Envionmental Modelling	United Kingdom en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andyjonesonice.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Andy Jones	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
affectnet.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	AffectNet \| The first comprehensive citation network map of the affective science literature.	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
henrydadams.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	WSU Environmental Ecology Lab \| Henry D. Adams PhD	United States~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.