Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to douguizard.com

Douguizard — Doug Vargas · Senior Product Designer × AI · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
suheelee.com
Suhee Lee · Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
dorailles.com
Dóra Illés — Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
annagrynko.com
Anna Grynko — Senior Product Designer · Systems & AI
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
meetjohn.com
John Christensen - Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
jestazyao.com
Jestaz Yao — Senior Product Designer · Design Systems & AI · NYC
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
nimatt.com
Nima tabatabaei - Senior Product Designer | Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
gaoqianjun.com
Gao Qianjun — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
garethchainey.com
Gareth Chainey | Product Designer × AI
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
jinsdesign.com
Jin Choi — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
nicoleharapes.com
Nicole Harapes — AI Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
rachaelpage.com
Rachael Page — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
emirkanerkara.com
AI-First Lead Product Designer — Emirkan Erkara
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
akritisingh.com
Akriti Singh | Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
alejandrogonba.com
Alex González · Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
nikhildesetti.com
Nikhil Desetti - UX Consultant & Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
jhilwig.com
Jay Hilwig — Product Designer | Enterprise UX, AI, Complex Systems
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
akash-trivedi.com
Akash Trivedi — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
roksanapaluch.com
Roksana Paluch — Product System Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.