Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to douglasarvidson.com

Douglas Arvidson – Award Winning Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
reneerockland.com
Renee Rockland – Award-winning Author
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
malpeet.com
Mal Peet | Mal Peet Award Winning Author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
denicehugheslewis.com
Books & Screenplays by Award Winning Author Denice Hughes Lewis
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
makennalee.com
Welcome! - Award-Winning Author Makenna Lee
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
amtyson.com
A.M. Tyson – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
paulagleeson.com
Paula Gleeson – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
maldouglas.com
Mal Douglas - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
nataliama.com
Natalia Ma – Aspiring Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
simonhally.com
Simon Hally | Award-Winning Novelist & Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
terrigreeningauthor.com
Terri Greening – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
andreahairston.com
Andrea Hairston – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
pattieddington.com
Patti Eddington – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
patsheehy.com
patricia sheehy, award winning author - Patricia Sheehy, author of metaphysical novels
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
annacrowleyredding.com
Anna Crowley Redding: Award-winning Author for Children and Teens
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
amyhueston.com
Amy Hueston – author/singer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
charleneawilson.com
Charlene A. Wilson – USA Today Bestselling Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
renagardin.com
Rena Gardin – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
terrinolan.com
Terri Nolan – Author
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.