similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to dotvcs.com

Dotvcs alternatives & similar sites

DotVCS | The Native Forge for Jujutsu — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
kustoking.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Kusto King \| The go to shop for KQL	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnetframework.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	View the source code for .NET classes	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
claudestack.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Claude Stack — The community hub for Claude Code users	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5error.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	5 Error \| Software, stories, and the world they're built in.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ablyintel.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Ably — Real-Time Intelligence for the Power System	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ianvoyce.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Programming and Debugging Tidbits \| The personal blog of Ian Voyce.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eatplayhate.me ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Eat/Play/Hate \| The ramblings of a crazed mind	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
claudecodetips.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	ClaudeCodeTips — Swipeable Tips for Claude Code	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trevorcroteau.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Trevor-Croteau-Data-Portfolio \| This is a place for my journey through learning data science. I will include the code produced for each project of my mine as well as a brief description and the visualizations produced.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
techfortalk.uk ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Tech For Talk – A Tech Site for Software Professionals	GB en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
techfortalk.co.uk ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Tech For Talk – A Tech Site for Software Professionals	GB en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clickablebliss.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Mike Zornek	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fromc2rust.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	FromC2Rust Publications \| Rust for C engineers	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
absolutearray.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	In a quest for vast knowledge	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abhishekdey.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	The Algorists - A comprehensive Platform for Coding, Algorithms, Data Structures, Low Level Design, System Design	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helloscriptkitty.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Lucas McGregor – Code, culture, and the occasional haggis.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ianmorozoff.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Pwsh+ \| Automate the world	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aeprox.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Blogging home of Aeprox - The technerdBlogging home of Aeprox \| The technerd	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.