similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to dotnettips.com

Dotnettips alternatives & similar sites

dotNetTips.com – Improving Code Quality… One Developer at a Time — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
rodrigocoincurvo.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Rodrigo Coin Curvo \| Software Developer Educator	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
strapengine.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Strapengine - Developer tutorials	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devdoc.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Developer's Documentation Collections	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
christophersalam.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Christopher Salam – :writing code and television	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developingthedeveloper.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Developing the developer - Write clean code and keep it simple.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cl4.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	cl4Dev - Java Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
changetocode.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Change to Code – Change Your Life One Line of Code at a Time	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chuckmblog.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Chuck M – A developer's journey	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
youssefsellami.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Youssef Sellami \| Yet another Dotnet developer	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnetcodegeeks.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	.NET Code Geeks \| .NET 2 .NET Developers Resource Center - .NET, C#, ASP.NET, Agile	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1ob.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Oskar Behzadpour — Student & Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stonesoupprogramming.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Stone Soup Programming – Web Development, Explanations, Techniques	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chapi.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Luis C Gomez - Developer who makes computers less annoying	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
24hscripts.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	24hScripts - Premium Developer Snippets	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aerulion.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	aerulion - Java Developer & Minecraft Plugin Creator	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnetnakama.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	.NET Nakama \| Helps software developers to improve their skills by providing easy reading articles in simple words.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acmedeveloper.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Acme Developer - Developer Tools	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnetlovers.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dotnetlovers - Coding Techniques Here	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.