Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to dotjorge.dev

.jorge - Front-end Web Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
lyavitski.com
Pavel Lyavitski - Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewmee.com
Andrew Mee: Front-end web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
buterina.com
Anastasia Buterina - Front-End & Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
nxndi.com
Nxndi - Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
bessa.dev
Ronald Bessa - Front-end developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ayanori-toyoda.com
Ayanori Toyoda - Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
odinokun.com
Dmytro Hordiienko - front-end developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ericdavid.io
Eric David | Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
agustinlarzabal.com
Agustín Larzábal - Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
erictarter.com
Eric Tarter | Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
bobbylipps.com
Bobby Lipps - Front-End / Cloud Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
daypex.com
Jake Jarvis – Frontend Web Developer in Boston, MA
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rubinahuria.com
Rubina Huria — Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andrepichardo.com
André Pichardo | Front-End Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
avoinicu.com
Adrian Voinicu | front-end developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
oguzhan.dev
Oguzhan Yilmaz — Front-end Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
alaabadran.com
Alaa Badran - Front-End Eng. & Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
gionaf.com
Giona | Web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.