similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to dorianheetman.com

Dorian Heetman · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Brian Fitzgerald

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

adrianbaldwin.net

Adrian Baldwin Home

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

femalescriblerian.com

The Female Scriblerian -

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

robertlacey.com

Robert Lacey - British historian and writer

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

thelionessofliteracy.com

Bookakorian Archives - The Lioness of Literacy

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

thelastbetbook.com

The Last Bet — Julian Harlow

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

benwritesthings.com

Ben Miller – is a writer & historian in Berlin

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arianelaval.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

activetechnology.co.uk 🇬🇧

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anneofoxfordstreet.com

Anne Young - Writer & Historian | Anne of Oxford Street

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

roleythomas.com

Roley Thomas | Writer & Historian

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

annashechtman.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arinabauthor.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.