Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to doowb.dev

doowb (Brian Woodward) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
akeemnicholas.com
Akeem Nicholas Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
anvillasoto.com
Alexander Villasoto
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
aletheia.dev
Portfolio — Zachary Woods
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nikitsya.com
Nikita Smiichyk - Backend Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
bunchhieng.com
Bunchhieng Soth | Full-Stack Software Engineer | Klaviyo
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
buzzkaan.com
Kaan Demir — Full Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
defectivecode.com
Defective Code
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
nkodag.com
Navin Kodag | Developer 🚀
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bitsnacker.com
bitsnacker
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
anouarderja.com
Anouar Derja
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
nodejsoc.com
Node.js OC | Node.js OC Meetup
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bkpecho.com
Bryan King Pecho | Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
biomousavi.com
Home | Nick Mousavi
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
nihaljangave.com
Nihal Jangave | Home
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
oskari.io
Oskari Rautiainen
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
lillianlakes.com
Lakes | Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
nkperez.com
Frank Perez — Writing | Frank Perez
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
meganbarber.com
Chris Barber
3 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.