Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to doomfrog.dev

Tony Howarth — Game Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
karimmachlab.com
Karim Machlab — Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
sandveilstudios.com
Sandveil Studios — Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
ahmedalnour.com
Ahmed Elnour | Senior Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
gialarconv.com
Giovanni Alarcón — Senior Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
s3games.com
S3Games — Video Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
oguzkonya.com
oguzkonya | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
noxlor.com
Noxlor Game Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
gismogames.io
Gismo Games | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
erickthedev.com
ErickTheDev — Game Developer & Web Engineer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
erginturk.com
M. Ergin Türk — Game Engine Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
erimergin.com
Erim Ergin | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
onurcanyasar.com
Onur Can Yasar | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
pixelvoices.com
Pixel Voices - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
aldigamedev.com
Aldi Rusdi - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
beraticapaal.com
Berati - Indie Game Developer | Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
agaitan.dev
Alejo Gaitán — Game & Software Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
ryanmus.com
Ryan Mus – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
ibrahimenescolak.com
Ibrahim Enes Colak | Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.