Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to donovanporter.com

Donovans Professional Page · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
fchagasjr.com
fchagasjr's Personal Page
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
donovanmaas.com
Donovan Maas
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
dotnetfunda.com
.NET Tutorials for Beginners and Intermediate level software professionals - DotNetFunda.com
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alexvilvert.net
Alex Vilvert - Computer Science Professor
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
diynottry.com
Home Page
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
codeblower.com
Front Page
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ninadchaudhari.com
Ninad Chaudhari's Profile
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ninadtech.com
Ninad Chaudhari's Profile
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
coderational.com
coderational
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
pkavasseri.com
Landing Page
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
codefarm.io
CodeFarm.io - passion projects
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
matteocroce.com
Matteo Croce personal homepage
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
argelhernandezamaya.com
Argel's Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
haarisiqbal.com
Haaris Projects
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
piotrmieczkowski.com
Portfolio page
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ariafallah.com
Aria's Home Page
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
soham.io
Soham's Home Page
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
intentionalcode.com
Intentional Code — Intentional Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.