Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to dominiclim.dev

Dominic Lim · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
acmdom.dev
Dominik
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
arkelziko.com
Arkel Ziko
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
arnabiscoding.com
ARNAB IS CODING
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewsturman.com
Andrew Sturman | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
argumatronic.com
argumatronic -
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
dochoffiday.com
Home - AJ Hoffer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
maxgcoding.com
MaxGCoding.com - A Software Engineering Space.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
pembrokesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Pembroke Software
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
kyleaclark.com
Kyle A. Clark
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alex-abraham.dev
Alex Abraham | Software Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
abi.io
abi@io:~$ ~/writing
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
camerondoyle.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Doyle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
kylezweng.com
Projects | Data Analytics | Kyle Zweng
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
adamnengland.com
Adam N England – Professional Software Engineer, Amateur Human Being
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
aaccurso.me
Alan Accurso
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
benoto.net
sudo make ./
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
dolevoper.io
Dolevoper
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
masonreview.com
MasonReview
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.