Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to dogancan.dev

Dogancan Mavideniz · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
ethanmartinportfolio.com
Ethan Martin
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
magick-source.com
AvidMind
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ethanmaxey.com
Ethan Maxey
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
plusmobileapps.com
Plus Mobile Apps
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
computetogo.com
Crazy Ant Labs
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
mondaytogo.com
Crazy Ant Labs
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
resumeapps.ai
Welcome | We Build Mobile Apps
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
resumemobileapps.com
Welcome | We Build Mobile Apps
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
resumemobileapp.com
Welcome | We Build Mobile Apps
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
heliconapps.com
Helicon
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
dividendsolo.com
DividendSolo | I build software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
reyapp.io
Rey: build mobile apps visually
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
shiploop.io
ShipLoop
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
swipelab.com
SWIPELAB — Software Agency
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
maack.io
Hannes Christian Maack
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
momaher.dev
Mohamed A. Maher - Mobile App Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
sunteame.com
App Developer - Sun Teame Pte. Ltd.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gearsixlabs.com
Gear Six | Software Development and Testing Evidence
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.