similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to docsbydesign.com

Docsbydesign alternatives & similar sites

Docs by Design – Bob Watson ponders technical writing, API documentation, and the world in general — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dragsbaek.tech ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Dragsbaek’s Lab: Learning, experiments and technical writing.	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abbyfolio.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Abby Omotoso \| Content Strategist & Technical Writer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pixometra.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Pixometra Documentation	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deepwiki.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	DeepWiki \| AI documentation you can talk to, for every repo	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
feelr.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Feelr Documentation	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
synth-link.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	SynthLink API \| Collected Documents and LLM Insights	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designed-analytics.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Designed Analytics Blog – Real World Solutions	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
feynmanwiki.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	FeynmanWiki - Technical Blogs, Explained	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sylantix.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Sylantix - Your Technical Partner for Digital and AI Innovation	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fanoutqa.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	FanOutQA documentation	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
echristensen42.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Making Sense of Technology – Digital disruption, business transformation and the Internet of just about Everything	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abwaters.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	ABWaters — Quiet writing, carefully made	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bayesfit.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	BayesFit's API documentation — BayesFit 2.4.1 documentation	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diasporablog.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Diaspora Blog - Wishing You Innovation, Progress, and Endless Possibilities in Technology!	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
aaron-hays.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Aaron Hays \| Building with AI, Documenting the Process	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
happihacking.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	HappiHacking - Erik Stenman's Writing and Systems Work	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
narraitio.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Narraitio \| Annotated Synthetic Document Dataset Generator for Document AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abdysingh.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Abhyuday's Experiments \| Projects, Tutorials, and Writing	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.