Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to dnavdeej.com

dnavdeej · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
matiadosen.com
Matia Dosen Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
68match
alexkaczynski.com
Alex Kaczynski UX
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
faridehmehri.com
Farideh Mehri | Web Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
adamkaplan.me
Adam Kaplan
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
mat-m.com
Mat Mars
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
mattoberdierdesign.com
Matt Oberdier Design
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
rlanda.com
Ramiro Landa
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
benleggiero.me
Ky – Developer & Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
maureenvogel.com
Maureen Vogel | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
newwebsitedesigner.com
New Website Designer - Basic Website Design Guide
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
3foldmedia.com
3Fold Media
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
kunaldewan.com
Kunal Dewan's UX Design website
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
cmmwebdesign.com
Cmm Web Design - Cmm Web Design
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
feliksm.com
Feliks Marciniak - Graphic Design
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
gretchenmaciolek.com
Gretchen Maciolek | UX and Content Designer
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
matteoliver.com
Matthew Oliver - Home
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
mattmoralesdesign.com
Matt Morales UX/UI Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
mbhwebdesign.com
MBH Web Design
1 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.