similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to dmkalin.com

Dan M. Kalin – Reader and Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

rhettallenauthor.com

Rhett Allen – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

caitlynsurkein.com

Caitlyn Surkein – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

G.B. Gillean – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

maciecraven.com

Macie Craven – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

monicawagnerauthor.com

M. M. WAGNER – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

susienoonan.com

Susie Noonan – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

annacolekane.com

Anna Cole-Kane – Author – Writer and Author

2 shared topicsfiction

calliefowlerwrites.com

Callie Fowler – Author and Editor

2 shared topicsfiction

esbarrison-author.com

E.S. Barrison – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Shirley Qin – Austin-based Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Ly Faulk – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

helencorcoran.com

Helen Corcoran – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andreahairston.com

Andrea Hairston – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

angeladandy.com

Angela Dandy – Author and playwright

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Anna Stride – MG and YA Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anneboothauthor.com

Anne Booth – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Cal Devney – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

G.E. Forth – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.