Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to dloftus.com

Dave Loftus · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
andrewluka.com
Andrew Luka
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
playanext.com
PlayaNext
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
iterativelogic.com
Iterative Logic
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
bastian-isensee.com
Bastian Isensee
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
jackgisel.com
Jack Gisel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anphan.com
An Phan | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
hemantapkh.com
Hemantapkh
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
isaza.dev
Dan Isaza - Customer-obsessed fullstack software engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
annanay.dev
Annanay Agarwal – Staff Software Engineer, Grafana Labs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ishmeetbindra.com
Ishmeet Bindra
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
iwave.ai
iWave Global
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
iwave-global.com
iWave Global
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pmargarido.dev
Pedro Margarido
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewhxue.com
Andrew Xue
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andreasellwanger.com
Andreas Ellwanger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anthonyarellano.com
Anthony Arellano
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
cameronlai.com
Cameron Lai - Cameron Lai
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
connyay.com
Connor Hindley
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.