similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to dloftesness.com

Dloftesness alternatives & similar sites

David Loftesness - Engineering Leader & Advisor — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dermotdooley.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Dermot Dooley \| Senior Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derikwhittaker.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Engineering Leader 1	en	executive-leadership-and-management Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
john-cline.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	John Cline - Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonahhorowitz.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Jonah Horowitz \| Hands-On Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonah.ai ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Jonah Horowitz \| Hands-On Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josepedronunes.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	José Pedro Nunes - Mental Models for Engineering Leaders	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jordianderl.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Jordi Anderl — Senior Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathantravis.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Travis — Engineering Leader & Platform Architect	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
baugh.me ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Dan Baugh \| Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joaquinoribe.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Joaquin Oribe - Engineering Manager & Technical Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diaryofacto.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	The Diary of a CTO — Podcast for Engineering Leaders	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josuetello.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Josue Tello — Senior Product & Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1month-ai.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	1Month — Engineering Leadership at AI-Era Velocity	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
b0jan.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Bojan Terzic \| Quality Engineering Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joshlander.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Josh Lander \| Engineering Leadership, Systems, and Technical Writing	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
systemiclead.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Systemic Lead \| Engineering Leadership Beyond the Code	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demetriusnunes.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Demetrius Nunes, Engineering Executive & AI Advisor	BR~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
josezarazua.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jose Zarazua — Engineering leadership \| Jose Zarazua	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.