Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to dlesman.com

David Eitan Lesman | Imperial College London · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
idealsolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
David Mills
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
dmsnydervo.com
David Snyder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
dnnguyen.com
David Nguyen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
groffland.com
DAVID W. GROFF
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
sojevic.com
David Sojevic
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
beni.tech
David Beníček
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
therealdavidcole.com
The Cole Archive — David A. Cole
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
3mindscollective.com
3Minds Collective
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
materialsemantics.com
material semantics
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
somanahmad.com
Soman | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
softisfy.com
Softisfy - The Digital Craft Collective
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
thelondonecho.com
Home - TheLondonEcho
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
material-react-table.com
Material React Table V3
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
rodvold.com
David Rodvold's Home Page
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
argarthcollective.com
The Argarth Collective Ltd
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
dmontaner.com
David Montaner — Home page
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
mcdanal.com
David
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
andyhayman.org
Andy Hayman | Digital Workspace
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.