Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to dklevine.com

David Levine's Economic and Game Theory Page · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
dlagziel.com
David Lagziel | Lecturer | Economics & Game Theory
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
gametheoryblog.com
GameTheoryInsights - Blog about Game Theory
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
gamesecon.com
Economics for business, policy and society - GAMES Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
gameseconomics.com
Economics for business, policy and society - GAMES Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
bd-econ.com
BD Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
itreconomics.com
Home - ITR Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
henriquedeoliveira.com
Henrique De Oliveira – Economic Theory
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
beautifuleconomics.com
Beautiful Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
rfbeo.com
RF Bahamas Economic Outlook 2026
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
concreteeconomics.com
Home | Concrete Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
cadburyeconomics.com
Cadbury Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
dis-economic.com
Economic Consulting and Trading Services - DIS Economic
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
commonmaneconomics.com
Common Man Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
rgeconomicadvisors.com
RG Economic Advisors
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
garciaecheverri.com
Economic Research | Eduardo Garcia Echeverri
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
pkocourek.com
Pavel Kocourek — Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
rguntin.com
Rafael Guntin — Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
cairnecon.com
Cairn Economic Advisors | Your Fractional Chief Economist
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.