Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to dkasa.dev

David Kasakaitis · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
anidealfuture.com
David Brokenshire
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
heyeduardo.com
Eduardo Rocha | Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andrelousamarques.com
André Lousa Marques
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
dimatosaurus.com
dimatosaurus
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
magemi.dev
Emilio's Crag
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
moisesguimaraes.com
Moisés Guimarães
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
helabenkhalfallah.com
Code, Craft & Community - Sharing my journey in software development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
constantcodegardener.com
The Constant Code Gardener
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
connorleung.com
Connor Leung
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nvkhuy.com
nvkhuy
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andreberlemont.com
André Berlemont
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
pixcoders.com
Rafal Spacjer blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
reverentengineer.com
Reverent Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
kodeninja.dev
Home • KodeNinja
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andremello.dev
André Mello Dev Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
antonsuprun.com
Anton Suprun
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
maggiecycy.com
Maggie | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
iurii.io
Iurii Chmykhun
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.