Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to djkillauris.com

a d.j. killauris journal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
gumjournal.com
GUM Journal
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
nevermorejournal.com
Nevermore Journal
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
newmiamijournal.com
New Miami Journal
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
pinoyboyjournals.com
PINOY BOY JOURNALS
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
thekitsunejournal.com
The Kitsune Journal
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
acholmesbooks.com
HOME | Shelby Morrow Journals
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
animoscrypt.com
Irregular Bones | A Writer's Journal
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
kristidrillien.com
A Journey of Words
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
nextjourneybooks.com
Next Journey Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
gwenflorio.com
Gwen Florio | Novelist. Journalist. Speaker.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
thejourneytowriting.com
The Journey to Writing
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
therememberjournals.com
Shadow Journey Creator
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
alexandraszantojournal.com
Alexandra Szanto Journal – Writing, as myself!
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
roeriverreview.com
Roe River Review – A Journal of Short Fiction
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
adambenderwrites.com
Adam Bender – Dystopian Author and Tech Journalist
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
bluemarblereview.com
Blue Marble Review - Literary Journal for Young Writers
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
djmaughan.com
HOME | AUTHOR D.J. MAUGHAN
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
dlanajourney.com
True Crime Memoir | the Miraculous Journey
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.