Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to distantlighthouse.com

Distant Lighthouse · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
distantid.com
distantID
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
composurelabs.io
Composure Labs
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
distanttoaster.com
Distant Toaster Pty Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
sunlightsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Sunlight
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
ethacore.com
Ethacore
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
monkeyfuse.com
Monkeyfuse - Software House
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
madebyhousecat.com
Housecat Studio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
distantdata.com
DistantData Systems
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
campfirium.com
Campfirium
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
kojobi.com
Kojo Software House
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
moonlighterapps.com
Moonlighter Apps — We build apps that ship.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
shanzhamm.com
Betaflight
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
planctons.com
planctons
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
knubes.com
Knubes Software Oy
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
anchorandloop.com
Voice Assistant
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
shedsoftwaredevelopment.com
Shed Software Development
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
divinelightlabs.com
Divine Light Labs
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
plymouth-labs.com
Plymouth Labs
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.