similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to disabilityrightsca.org

Disabilityrightsca alternatives & similar sites

Disability Rights California — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Government Support And Welfare →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
disabilitywaco.org ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	Disability Waco	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
disability.gi ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Gibraltar Local Disability Movement	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
disabilitywales.org ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Home. - Disability Wales	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drcmn.org ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Disability Resource Center MN in	US~ en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
addc.org.au ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Australian Disability & Development Consortium \| Disability Equity	AU en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ability-haven.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Ability Haven	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
disabilitythreeera.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Disability 3.0 — Building a New Era of Belonging and Access	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
disability3era.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Disability 3.0 — Building a New Era of Belonging and Access	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
disabilitynetworks.info ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Manx Disability Information - Disability Networks	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
disabilitiesexpoindiana.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Disabilities Expo \| WindSwell Foundation	US~ en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
disabilityinclusions.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	DISABILITY INCLUSION –SIERRA LEONE	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uwcec.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Homepage – United Way of Central Eastern California	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
csda.net ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Home - California Special Districts Association	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
disabilityinclusionpgh.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Disability Inclusion & Access – Moving Forward	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abilityfirstottawa.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Ability First Ottawa	en	government-support-and-welfare Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accessablescot.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	accessAble Scot \| Accessibility Scotland	en	government-support-and-welfare Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4du.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	4du.org – For the Greater Disability Community and their Allies	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cwcac.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Central Wisconsin Community Action Council \| CWCAC.ORG	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.