Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to dipayanpaul.com

Dipayan Paul | Game Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
connorwolf.com
Connor Wolf | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
cameronconnick.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Connick | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
heyleiloo.dev
heyLeiloo | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
heyleiloo.com
heyLeiloo | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
mohamedabdelkhalek.com
Mohamed | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
ricardoliuportfolio.com
Ricardo Liu – Video Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
anonnewyork.com
Marcus Song | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
gavineo.dev
Gavin Parr - Game Designer & Producer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
antonindruelle.com
Game Designer | Antonin Druelle
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
herondil.com
Maxens Dubois | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
dinghongkai.com
Hongkai Ding || Game Designer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
heriamoliveira.com
Heriam Oliveira | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
kp-strife.com
Kevin "Strife" Pourtier - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
gamesthatdomore.com
Owen Leach: Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
ricerogue.com
Eric Ni — Game Designer & Partnerships
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
richardacherki.com
Richard Acherki | Game Designer & Creative Director
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
eshnaidm.dev
Erich Shnaidman — Game Designer & QA Tester
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
supergamedesign.com
Super Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.