Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to dinssa.com

Full Stack Developer, London - Manny Dinssa · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
ivinny.com
Vinay - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mohibkhan.com
Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
shanehoban.com
Shane Hoban | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
gavhart.com
Gavin Hart | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
gatinafoy.com
Gatina Foy | Full Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
anasbelbaz.com
Anas | Full stack developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
dishantkapoor.com
Dishant Kapoor - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
heyarda.dev
arda — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
planetmalone.com
Sean Malone - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andersonmpereira.com
Anderson Pereira - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
shen-dev.com
Shen | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
surajcodes.dev
Suraj Sharma | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
oceanyu.dev
Ocean Yu - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
anasbenani.dev
Anas Benani | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
itshaseeb.com
Haseeb Ahmed - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
swarndev.com
Swarna Sahu | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
anushka.dev
Anushka Ughade | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
odedo.dev
Oded Winberger | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.