similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to dillonstanco.com

Dillonstanco alternatives & similar sites

Humanities Lab – A Research Center for the Humanities at American University — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
curedu.org ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	The Center for Urban Research in Education	en	education Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4humanities.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	4Humanities -- Search Engine for Humanities Research	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bardaaup.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Bard AAUP – Online home for The Bard College Chapter of the American Association of University Professors	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drcomptonhistory.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Dr. C@ KWU – Applied History & Humanities at Kansas Wesleyan University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nathanfavero.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Nathan Favero – Provost Associate Professor at American University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cssar.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Center for Social Security Action & Research	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
battlefortheamericanmind.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Battle for the American Mind	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
battlefortheamericanmind.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Battle for the American Mind	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalmontpelier.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cunyhumanitiesalliance.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	CUNY Humanities Alliance – Bridging Teaching and Learning through the Humanities	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 3
joshualeon.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Joshua K. Leon \| Iona University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nav-next.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	The cultural lanscape – Lehigh University student journalists	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ndamstamericana.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Americana – Americana is the student-created, student-run undergraduate research journal from the University of Notre Dame’s Department of American Studies and Gallivan Program in Journalism, Ethics, & Democracy.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denisonlibrary.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Library \| Denison University	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
denisonlibrary.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Library \| Denison University	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
denisonlibrary.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Library \| Denison University	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
plagaware.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Plagiarism Check \| For Universities, Students and SEO	en	education Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
beachcommons.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	The Global Education Commons – A worldwide educational space for the emancipation of the human spirit	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.