similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to digitallearners.net

Digitallearners alternatives & similar sites

Designing Learning to Engage, Enrich, and Empower — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jolenexus.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Journal of Learning and Educational Nexus	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
8billionideas.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Future-focused learning that empowers your students \| 8billionideas	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sustainable-learning.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Sustainable Learning - Bridging the gap	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thelearningalliance.co.uk ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	The Learning Partnership	GB en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
activelearningblog.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Active Learning for Higher Education – Student Centered Engagement	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baobablearning.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Home - Baobab Learning Center	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sussexlearningnetwork.org.uk ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Home - Sussex Learning Network	GB en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctlonline.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Home - CTL - Collaborative for Teaching and Learning	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
curtisbigeloweducator.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Curtis Bigelow \| Education, Leadership & Lifelong Learning	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4apal.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Partnership for the Advancement of Learning \|	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4thwalleducation.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	The 4th Wall Education \| Breaking the Illusion of Learning	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dearbornhub.net ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	The Hub for Teaching and Learning Resources – At the University of Michigan – Dearborn	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3upartnership.ie ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	3upartnership - Empowering Minds, Shaping Futures	IE en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luisperezonline.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	The Website of Luis Perez – Insights on Inclusive Learning Technology.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
appliedscholastics.org.uk ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Applied Scholastics International \| Study Technology to Overcome Any Learning Problem	GB en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
appliedscholastics.ie ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Applied Scholastics International \| Study Technology to Overcome Any Learning Problem	IE en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accudemic.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Accudemic – Working collaboratively to ensure every student achieves academically, socially, and emotionally.	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jojura.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	MusingsOnTandL.com – Musings on Teaching & Learning – Thoughts, Notes, Ideas, Reflections…	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.