similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to digital-humanism.org

Digital Humanism alternatives & similar sites

The Digital Humanism Initiative — DIGHUM — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
digitalinclusioninitiative.org ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Digital Inclusion Initiative	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
digitalbirmingham.co.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Digital Birmingham - Smart City Initiatives and Innovation Hub	GB en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prodyna.co.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Navigating the Digital Future Together \| PRODYNA	GB en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digikite.net ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Your Digital Transformation Partner — DigiKite	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dipo.app ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	dipo.app — Digital Playground	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digiactive.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	DigiActive \| Digital Activism & Grassroots Tech Resource	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
digitalwarden.pro ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Digital Warden – Medium	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
upoli.ai ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Upoli — The digital architecture that governance needs	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitaltwinhub.co.uk ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - Digital Twin Hub	GB en	technology-and-computing Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usecollage.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Collage — Digital Asset Management for Growing Brands	US~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aca5o.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	aca5o — Digital Products & Transformation Studio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalstrike.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Digital Strike — Digital Protests, Boycotts & Actions Against Big Tech	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalimpactinitiative.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Digital Impact Alliance – For a positive digital future	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
digitalimpactinitiative.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Digital Impact Alliance – For a positive digital future	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
digitalimpactalliance.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Digital Impact Alliance – For a positive digital future	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
digitalimpactalliance.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Digital Impact Alliance – For a positive digital future	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
lrgex.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	LRGEX — Digital Engineering Duo \| LRGEX	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalrhetoriccollaborative.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Sweetland Digital Rhetoric Collaborative	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.