Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to dieptran.com

Diep Tran – Journalist, Editor, Critic · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
nikboyanov.com
Nikola Boyanov – Editor
1 shared topicsmovies
70match
antonietarico.com
Antonieta Rico | Multimedia Journalist
1 shared topicsmovies
70match
filmdisclosure.com
Film Disclosure – Portfolio of work for Film Journalist Kat Hughes
1 shared topicsmovies
69match
ajaybennett.com
- Independent Media Journalism
1 shared topicsmovies
67match
donnieleapheart.com
DONNIE LEAPHEART – EDITOR
1 shared topicsmovies
67match
r-emmetsweeney.com
R. Emmet Sweeney – Film Criticism
1 shared topicsmovies
67match
dramastan.com
Dramastan – Joja Entertainment
1 shared topicsmovies
66match
filmeditorphil.com
FILM EDITOR PHIL
1 shared topicsmovies
66match
nikkyathan.com
Nikky Athan – Actor
1 shared topicsmovies
66match
jeremylarge.com
Jeremy Large Writing & Consulting Services – Online HQ for Jeremy Large – writer, editor, and instructional design consultant.
1 shared topicsmovies
66match
meanmamadog.com
KELLY O'NEAL – actor, artist, filmmaker
1 shared topicsmovies
66match
ronancoleman.com
Ronan Coleman – COMPOSER
1 shared topicsmovies
66match
graedrake.com
Grae Drake: Host, Journalist, Media Sensationalist
1 shared topicsmovies
65match
anupamasubramanian.com
Anupama Subramanian | Veteran Entertainment Journalist | Film Reviews, Interviews and Features
1 shared topicsmovies
65match
anothergaze.com
Another Gaze - A journal of films and feminisms
1 shared topicsmovies
65match
jennivision.com
jennivision – i saw that
1 shared topicsmovies
65match
subvoyant.com
HOME – SUBVOYANT
1 shared topicsmovies
65match
sueprado.com
Sue Prado – actor
1 shared topicsmovies

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.