Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to dfdxlabs.com

dfdx labs · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
56match
gabrielrt.com
Gabriel Romeo Tomaz | Analytics Engineer
1 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
50match
felixjesse.com
Felix Jesse – Senior PM & Head of Product
3 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
46match
hadiahamed.com
Hadi Ahamed — Strategy Intelligence & Data Engineering
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
44match
itcamedia.com
ITCA - Inversiones Tecnológicas de Centroamérica S.A. de C.V.
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
43match
abhishekadhikari.com
Abhishek Adhikari – Agritech Entrepreneur & Community Builder | Nepal
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
41match
butyll.com
Butyll Labs — Technology Consulting Dubai
2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
41match
7ninelabs.com
7Nine TechLabs | The Product Transformation Lab
2 shared tech1 shared categorymanagement-consulting-industry
41match
ignitionpointlabs.com
Ignition Point Labs — National deep-tech commercialization hubs
2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
40match
maderatechnologies.com
Madera Technologies — Infrastructure for the Next Generation of Finance
2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
40match
mahnoor-rizwan.com
Mahnoor Rizwan - Product Engineer
2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
40match
gurkhax.com
GURKHAX - Innovative Tech Solutions
2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
40match
gyuso.com
GYUSO Technologies | Semiconductor & IT Services
2 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.